Intellectual Property

Lawrence Solum has a good thoughtful post today considering the RIAA’s recent tactic of threatening to file numerous lawsuits against people who share many copyrighted songs on peer-to-peer networks.

Go read it.

I agree with Solum that this strategy is not likely to be successful, and that the future of file-trading depends on the evolution of “copynorms” (the informal social attitudes about the rightness or wrongness of duplicating material that is copyrighted).

I think this topic is fascinating and I’m very curious to see how this all plays out.

I used to think these issues were straightforward. It seemed clear to me that artists and authors should have complete intellectual property rights over their works and should be able to dictate the terms of their distribution and use. But, over time, things began to look a bit murkier. Digital copies are different from objects whose use by one person excludes its use by another. It seems that there are limits to what kind of control over these copies the creator should have.

I’m not very confident that our legal system will strike the right balance, but I hope that markets and the common sense of most people will get us to a reasonable state where artists are compensated for their efforts and fans have enough flexibility to explore and enjoy the works without onerous restrictions

It should be an interesting ride.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s